Remark code N193 indicates a service may be covered by a specific federal, state, or local program, suggesting an alternate payer.
Remark code N193 indicates that there may be coverage for this service under a specific federal, state, or local program, and that another payer, rather than the one being billed, could be responsible for the payment. Healthcare providers should investigate alternative funding sources that could potentially cover the cost of the service provided.
Common causes of code N193 are:
1. The service provided is typically covered by a specific federal, state, or local program rather than the payer being billed, indicating that the claim may need to be redirected to the appropriate program for payment.
2. Incorrect payer information on the claim, which may have led to the submission to a general insurance company instead of the specialized program designed to cover the service.
3. Lack of coordination between multiple payers, where the primary payer may not have been identified correctly, and the claim was submitted to a secondary payer instead.
4. The patient may be eligible for a specific program such as Medicaid, Medicare, or a state-funded program, but the claim was not submitted to these programs first as required by coordination of benefits rules.
5. The service code billed is exclusively covered under a government program due to regulations or contractual agreements, and the claim should have been directed to that program from the outset.
6. Failure to verify patient eligibility and benefits for the specific service before rendering services, leading to the claim being sent to the wrong payer.
7. The claim lacks necessary documentation or authorization that is required by the specific federal, state, or local program to demonstrate that the service is covered and payable by them.
Ways to mitigate code N193 include ensuring that patient eligibility and benefits are verified before services are rendered. This involves checking with the patient's insurance provider to determine if there is a specific federal, state, or local program that could be responsible for the coverage of the service. Additionally, maintaining up-to-date knowledge of various programs and their coverage criteria can help in identifying potential alternative payers early in the process.
Implementing a robust pre-authorization process can also help in preventing this code. This process should include verifying if the service requires prior authorization from the payer that is identified as the primary insurer or from any other program that may cover the service.
Regular training for billing staff on the nuances of different payer programs and the importance of accurate payer identification can further reduce the occurrence of code N193. This training should emphasize the need for meticulous documentation and coding practices to ensure that claims are submitted to the correct payer the first time.
Lastly, establishing a clear communication channel with patients to discuss their coverage options can aid in identifying any programs they may be enrolled in that could affect billing. Encouraging patients to disclose all possible coverage sources can prevent surprises during the billing process.
The steps to address code N193 involve a multi-faceted approach to ensure proper claim adjudication. Firstly, verify the patient's coverage details to determine if there is an alternative payer responsible for the service. This may require contacting the patient to gather additional insurance information or consulting with the program mentioned in the remark code.
Next, coordinate with the secondary payer to confirm their coverage policies and obtain authorization if necessary. Ensure that all required documentation, such as a referral or prior authorization, is in place and has been properly submitted.
If the secondary payer confirms coverage, resubmit the claim with the correct billing information and any required documentation to the appropriate payer. Keep a detailed record of all communications and submissions in case further follow-up is needed.
In the event that the secondary payer denies coverage or if there is no other payer, review the claim for any potential errors or missing information that could have led to the remark code. Correct any issues and resubmit the claim to the original payer with a detailed explanation or appeal, if appropriate.
Throughout this process, maintain clear and consistent communication with all parties involved, including the patient, to ensure that everyone is informed of the claim's status and any actions required.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
