Remark code N35 indicates a decision made after a program integrity or utilization review affecting payment.
Remark code N35 indicates that the payment decision was influenced by a program integrity review or utilization review. This means that the payer has assessed the claim based on their policies for appropriate use of services and has made a determination on payment accordingly. Providers should review the specifics of the claim to understand the payer's decision and determine if there are any actionable steps to address the issue or if additional documentation is needed to support the medical necessity or appropriateness of the services billed.
Common causes of code N35 are:
1. Services not deemed medically necessary upon review.
2. Frequency of services exceeding established guidelines.
3. Inconsistent billing practices detected for similar procedures.
4. Lack of proper documentation to support the services billed.
5. Services provided are not covered under the patient's current benefit plan.
6. Unusual or atypical use of procedure codes triggering an audit.
7. Beneficiary eligibility issues related to the services billed.
8. Duplicate claims submission for the same service or procedure.
9. Services rendered are in violation of the provider agreement terms.
10. Findings from random or targeted audits conducted by the payer.
Ways to mitigate code N35 include implementing comprehensive chart documentation practices to ensure all services are medically necessary and properly recorded. Regularly train staff on the latest coding standards and review protocols. Conduct internal audits to identify and address any discrepancies before claims submission. Establish a robust pre-claim review process to catch errors or inconsistencies that could trigger a utilization review decision. Engage in proactive communication with payers to understand their specific requirements and criteria for medical necessity and utilization. Utilize predictive analytics to identify patterns that might lead to code N35 and adjust practices accordingly. Maintain an up-to-date knowledge base of coding changes and payer policies to prevent outdated or incorrect coding that could result in a program integrity or utilization review issue.
The steps to address code N35 involve a thorough review of the claim and patient's medical records to ensure compliance with the payer's utilization guidelines. Begin by verifying the medical necessity and appropriateness of the services billed. Check for any potential errors in coding, such as incorrect procedure codes, modifiers, or dates of service that may have triggered the review decision.
Next, gather all relevant documentation that supports the medical necessity of the services provided, including progress notes, treatment plans, and any prior authorizations. If the documentation is incomplete or lacks sufficient detail, work with the clinical team to obtain the necessary information.
Once you have compiled all supporting documents, prepare a comprehensive appeal letter. Clearly outline the rationale for the services provided, referencing specific details from the patient's records and aligning them with the payer's coverage policies.
Submit the appeal package to the payer and monitor the status regularly. If the appeal is denied, consider reaching out to the payer's provider relations representative to discuss the case further or to clarify any outstanding issues.
In parallel, review your internal processes to identify any systemic issues that may have led to the utilization review decision. This may involve additional staff training, updates to your electronic health records system, or changes to your pre-authorization process to prevent similar issues in the future.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
