Remark code N381 is an alert to review contractual agreements for specific billing and payment rules related to charges.
Remark code N381 indicates: Alert: Consult our contractual agreement for restrictions/billing/payment information related to these charges.
Common causes of code N381 are:
1. Services provided are not covered under the current contractual agreement between the healthcare provider and the insurance payer.
2. Incorrect billing of services that have specific restrictions or limitations as per the contractual agreement.
3. Failure to adhere to the billing guidelines outlined in the payer-provider contract, leading to disputes over the eligibility of charges.
4. Misinterpretation of the contractual terms related to payment rates, leading to incorrect charge submissions.
5. Lack of updated information on the provider's end regarding changes or amendments to the contractual agreement that affect billing and payment processes.
Ways to mitigate code N381 include implementing a comprehensive review process for all contractual agreements with payers to ensure full understanding and compliance with billing and payment terms. Regular training sessions for billing staff on the specifics of each payer contract can help avoid misunderstandings and errors related to charge restrictions. Additionally, employing automated billing systems that are programmed with the details of payer agreements can flag potential issues before claims are submitted, reducing the likelihood of receiving this code. Establishing a routine audit process to check for compliance with contractual agreements can also identify areas for improvement in the billing process, helping to prevent this issue from occurring.
The steps to address code N381 involve a multi-faceted approach focusing on internal review and external communication. Initially, gather and analyze the contractual agreement relevant to the patient's plan to understand the specific restrictions, billing, and payment information that the remark code refers to. This may involve consulting with your billing department or utilizing contract management software to pinpoint the exact clauses or terms in question.
Next, conduct an internal audit of the charges in question to ensure they were coded and billed correctly according to the terms outlined in the agreement. This step may require collaboration with the coding team to verify that the most accurate and current codes were used and with the billing team to ensure that the claim was submitted in compliance with the contract specifications.
If discrepancies or errors are identified during the internal review, correct them promptly and resubmit the claim with the necessary adjustments. Ensure that any corrections adhere strictly to the contractual terms to prevent further issues.
Should the internal review confirm that the charges were billed correctly according to the contract, prepare a detailed explanation or appeal, if applicable, to submit to the payer. This communication should clearly outline why the charges are in compliance with the contractual terms, supported by relevant documentation or references to specific sections of the agreement.
Throughout this process, maintain open lines of communication with the payer to clarify any misunderstandings and to seek guidance on how to proceed if the contractual terms are ambiguous or open to interpretation. This proactive approach can help resolve the issue more efficiently and prevent similar occurrences in the future.
Finally, consider this experience as a learning opportunity to review and possibly renegotiate contract terms that are frequently misunderstood or lead to billing issues, aiming to minimize future remark codes like N381.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
