Remark code N688 is an alert indicating a reversal due to a medical or utilization review decision.
Remark code N688 indicates: Alert: This reversal is due to a medical or utilization review decision.
Common causes of code N688 are:
1. The initial claim was paid, but subsequent medical review determined that the services were not medically necessary.
2. Documentation submitted does not support the level of care billed.
3. The procedure performed is considered experimental or investigational for the condition treated.
4. A pre-authorization was required but not obtained prior to the service being rendered.
5. The service was provided outside of the plan's network without prior approval.
6. The claim was initially processed in error, and the review identified discrepancies that necessitated a reversal.
7. The utilization review determined that a less costly service could have been used to achieve the same medical outcome.
8. The service exceeded the frequency limitations or maximum benefits allowed under the patient's health plan.
Ways to mitigate code N688 include implementing a robust pre-authorization process to ensure that all services and procedures meet the necessary medical criteria before they are performed. Regularly training staff on the latest utilization review guidelines and maintaining open communication with payers about their specific requirements can also help. Additionally, conducting internal audits to identify and address any discrepancies in medical necessity documentation before claims submission can prevent this code from being triggered. Establishing a dedicated team to handle denials and reversals, equipped to quickly respond and provide additional information or clarification to payers, can further reduce the incidence of code N688.
The steps to address code N688 involve a multi-faceted approach focusing on understanding the underlying reasons for the reversal and taking corrective actions. Initially, it's crucial to review the patient's medical records and the initial claim submission in detail to identify any discrepancies or missing information that could have led to the reversal decision. Engage with the medical or utilization review team to gather specific feedback on their decision. This may involve submitting additional documentation or evidence supporting the necessity and appropriateness of the care provided.
Next, evaluate the internal processes for claim submission and documentation. Ensure that all relevant medical information, including notes, test results, and justifications for the treatment, are accurately and thoroughly documented. Training staff on best practices for documentation and claim submission can prevent similar issues in the future.
If after your review and any necessary corrections, you believe the reversal was made in error, prepare and submit an appeal. This appeal should include a detailed explanation and any supporting documentation that addresses the reasons for the reversal as indicated by the review decision. Clearly outline why the treatment was medically necessary and provide any additional evidence that supports the claim.
Throughout this process, maintain open lines of communication with the payer. This can help clarify the specific reasons for the reversal and expedite the review of any resubmitted or appealed claims. Keeping detailed records of all communications, submissions, and decisions made will be crucial for tracking the progress of your response to code N688 and for any potential future disputes.
Finally, consider implementing a system for regularly reviewing and analyzing denied or reversed claims within your organization. This can help identify patterns or common issues leading to reversals, allowing for proactive adjustments to your processes and reducing the likelihood of similar denials in the future.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
