Remark code N72 indicates a PPS code revision by medical reviewers due to lack of clinical record support.
Remark code N72 indicates that the Prospective Payment System (PPS) code has been altered by medical reviewers because the original code submitted is not substantiated by the clinical documentation in the patient's records. This suggests that upon review, the medical necessity or the services provided as reflected in the clinical records did not align with the PPS code initially claimed, prompting a revision to ensure accurate billing and reimbursement. Providers should review the patient's medical records and the PPS code assignment to address any discrepancies and prevent future denials or adjustments.
Common causes of code N72 are discrepancies between the submitted PPS code and the medical reviewers' findings upon examining the clinical records. This may occur if the documentation does not sufficiently support the diagnosis, procedures, or services billed under the PPS code, leading to an adjustment by the medical reviewers to reflect what is supported by the patient's clinical information. Additionally, this code may be used if there is a lack of necessary documentation to justify the PPS code initially claimed, or if there was a misinterpretation of the coding guidelines that resulted in an incorrect PPS code submission.
Ways to mitigate code N72 include ensuring that the documentation in the clinical records is thorough and accurately reflects the services provided. It's important to have a robust documentation process in place that captures all relevant patient information, treatment decisions, and interventions. Regular training for medical staff on proper documentation practices can help prevent discrepancies between the services provided and the records. Additionally, implementing a pre-billing audit process to review and verify the accuracy of coding before claims submission can catch and correct any mismatches between the PPS code and the clinical documentation. Utilizing advanced coding software with built-in checks can also assist in ensuring that the codes submitted are fully supported by the clinical records. Collaboration between clinical staff and coders is essential to ensure that the codes are a true reflection of the patient's medical condition and the services rendered.
The steps to address code N72 involve a thorough review of the clinical documentation to understand the discrepancy identified by the medical reviewers. Begin by comparing the original PPS code submitted with the one assigned by the reviewers. Next, assess the clinical records to confirm whether the initial code was indeed supported by the documented patient care. If the original code was correct, compile all relevant documentation that substantiates the initial code and prepare a detailed written appeal to contest the reviewers' decision. If the documentation does not support the original code, update the billing records with the correct PPS code as determined by the reviewers. Ensure that all coding staff are informed of the change and the reasons behind it to prevent future occurrences. Additionally, consider implementing a quality assurance process to regularly review clinical documentation and coding accuracy before initial submission to minimize such discrepancies and denials.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
