Remark code N637 is an alert that consultations by the same provider post-treatment are not permitted for billing.
Remark code N637 indicates that consultations cannot be billed if treatment has already been provided by the same healthcare provider.
Common causes of code N637 are:
1. The healthcare provider submitted a claim for a consultation service after already providing treatment to the patient, which violates payer policies that consultations must precede treatment.
2. Incorrect coding or billing sequence was used, where treatment codes were submitted before consultation codes, leading to the rejection of the consultation claim.
3. Misinterpretation of the payer's guidelines regarding the definition of a consultation versus treatment, resulting in the inappropriate billing of a post-treatment service as a consultation.
4. Lack of communication or documentation to support the necessity of a consultation after the initiation of treatment, which is generally not covered unless specifically justified and pre-approved by the payer.
5. The use of an incorrect service code that categorizes a follow-up or subsequent service incorrectly as a consultation after treatment has commenced.
Ways to mitigate code N637 include ensuring that consultation services are billed correctly before the initiation of treatment. It's crucial to distinguish between consultation and treatment services in the patient's records and during billing. Providers should establish a clear timeline and documentation that separates the consultation phase from the treatment phase. Additionally, training staff to recognize and correctly code consultation services versus treatment services can prevent this issue. Implementing a pre-billing review process to catch and correct any misclassified services can also be beneficial.
The steps to address code N637 involve a multi-faceted approach to ensure accurate billing and compliance with payer policies. Firstly, review the patient's medical records and billing documentation to confirm that the service billed as a consultation meets the payer's criteria for consultations. If the service was indeed a consultation and occurred before the initiation of treatment, gather all supporting documentation, including referral letters, medical notes, and dates of service, to substantiate the claim.
If the service was incorrectly coded as a consultation when it should have been billed under a different service code, correct the billing error by adjusting the claim with the appropriate service code that reflects the nature of the visit. This may involve using an evaluation and management (E/M) service code that accurately describes the service provided.
In cases where the consultation was billed correctly but still denied, consider reaching out to the payer for clarification on their policies regarding consultations and treatment by the same provider. It may be beneficial to discuss the specific circumstances of the case to understand the denial's rationale and explore possible solutions.
If the payer maintains that consultations by the treating provider are not covered, assess the need for future consultations in the patient's care plan. It may be necessary to adjust the approach to consultations, such as referring the patient to a different provider for consultations, to comply with payer policies and ensure coverage for the patient.
Throughout this process, maintain clear and detailed documentation of all communications with the payer, as well as any changes made to billing practices or patient care plans in response to code N637. This documentation will be invaluable for future reference and for supporting billing and appeals processes.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
