Remark code N666 indicates that only one evaluation and management code at this service level is covered during the care course.
Remark code N666 indicates that only one evaluation and management code at this service level is covered during the course of care.
Common causes of code N666 are:
1. Submitting multiple evaluation and management (E/M) service codes for the same patient on the same day, when only one is allowed per the patient's coverage policy.
2. Incorrectly coding follow-up or additional E/M services that should be considered part of the initial service or global surgical package.
3. Failing to apply the correct modifier to indicate that a separate and distinct E/M service was performed on the same day as another service.
4. Misinterpretation of the payer's guidelines regarding the definition of a "course of care" and what constitutes a separate billable E/M service within that framework.
5. Lack of documentation or insufficient documentation to support the medical necessity of a separate and distinct E/M service on the same day.
Ways to mitigate code N666 include ensuring accurate and comprehensive documentation of each patient encounter to justify the medical necessity of multiple evaluation and management (E&M) services. Implement a robust review process to verify that each E&M service billed is distinct and not duplicative of services previously rendered. Utilize coding software or consult with coding specialists to ensure that E&M codes are applied correctly according to the specifics of the patient's condition and the services provided. Educate healthcare providers on the appropriate use of E&M codes, emphasizing the importance of detailed documentation to support the need for multiple services at the same service level. Regularly audit E&M coding practices to identify and address patterns that may lead to this code being triggered, adjusting billing practices as necessary to prevent future occurrences.
The steps to address code N666 involve a multi-faceted approach to ensure compliance and maximize reimbursement. Firstly, review the patient's medical records to verify the accuracy of the evaluation and management (E/M) service level billed. If the service level is accurately coded, assess the patient's course of care to determine if another E/M service at the same level was previously billed. If a duplicate billing error occurred, adjust the claim to remove the duplicate service.
Next, if the service was essential and distinct, prepare and submit a detailed appeal. This appeal should include a clear explanation of why the additional E/M service was medically necessary, supported by documentation such as progress notes, treatment plans, and any relevant clinical outcomes. Highlight any unique circumstances or complexities of the patient's condition that necessitated the additional E/M service.
Additionally, consider coding strategies for future claims to prevent similar denials. This may involve more precise documentation of the distinct nature of each E/M service provided during the course of care. Educate providers and coding staff on the importance of detailed documentation to support the medical necessity of each service billed.
Finally, monitor any updates or changes in payer policies regarding E/M services to ensure ongoing compliance and to optimize revenue cycle management strategies. Engaging in regular communication with payers can also provide insights into common reasons for denials and help tailor more effective billing practices.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
